Total Disaster Programs in Lane County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 201 to 220 of 1,244
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Lane County, Kansas totaled $34,924,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
201 | John D James | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $44,566 |
202 | Bentley Family Irrevocable Land Trust | Dighton, KS 67839 | $43,112 |
203 | E & M Land Management Inc | Dighton, KS 67839 | $43,102 |
204 | Daniel - Wick Living R Wick | Dighton, KS 67839 | $42,841 |
205 | Tad Davis | Dighton, KS 67839 | $42,473 |
206 | E Joe Hanks | Dighton, KS 67839 | $42,345 |
207 | Roger R Hineman | Dighton, KS 67839 | $42,314 |
208 | Jon C Haag | Dighton, KS 67839 | $42,285 |
209 | William A Huseman Trust No 1 | Dighton, KS 67839 | $42,276 |
210 | Wtm Miller Ranch LLC | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $42,101 |
211 | George B Collins | Dighton, KS 67839 | $42,098 |
212 | Mark Miller | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $42,092 |
213 | Mary E Eitel | Dighton, KS 67839 | $41,567 |
214 | Elvern D Borell | Dighton, KS 67839 | $41,002 |
215 | Ranger Feeders II LLC | Dighton, KS 67839 | $40,801 |
216 | Howard W Burnett | Dighton, KS 67839 | $40,645 |
217 | Paul Davis | Midland, TX 79707 | $40,251 |
218 | Dean C Speer | Dighton, KS 67839 | $40,157 |
219 | Brant Neil Mellies | Ness City, KS 67560 | $39,936 |
220 | Salt Creek Land & Cattle Co Inc | Dighton, KS 67839 | $39,442 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”