Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Lane County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 93
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Lane County, Kansas totaled $1,424,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Randy Whipple | Dighton, KS 67839 | $10,354 |
42 | Kent And Carrie Borell Living Trust | Dighton, KS 67839 | $9,496 |
43 | Guy Wayne Johnston | Dighton, KS 67839 | $9,345 |
44 | Smokey Hill River Cattle Co. LLC | Dighton, KS 67839 | $9,298 |
45 | Richard J. Price | Dighton, KS 67839 | $8,826 |
46 | Mark Boaldin | Garden City, KS 67846 | $8,162 |
47 | Myron E Popp | Utica, KS 67584 | $8,039 |
48 | Ty Panzner | Jetmore, KS 67854 | $8,025 |
49 | Gary Hauschild | Dighton, KS 67839 | $7,855 |
50 | Gary - Shapland Family Revocable Lvg Tr Shapland | Dighton, KS 67839 | $7,846 |
51 | Brendon Beesley | Gove, KS 67736 | $7,502 |
52 | Bruce Algrim | Garden City, KS 67846 | $7,491 |
53 | John Mauch Jr | Beeler, KS 67518 | $7,356 |
54 | Marvin Whipple | Pawnee Rock, KS 67567 | $7,247 |
55 | Mark Shapland | Dighton, KS 67839 | $7,045 |
56 | William H Mcleish | Ness City, KS 67560 | $6,276 |
57 | Oscar E Obregon | Garden City, KS 67846 | $6,257 |
58 | , | $6,257 | |
59 | Victor Penka Family Trust | Dighton, KS 67839 | $6,182 |
60 | Howard W Burnett | Dighton, KS 67839 | $5,484 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”