Farm Subsidy information
Lane County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Lane County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 411
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lane County, Kansas totaled $16,050,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Slash T Farm | Kalvesta, KS 67835 | $44,870 |
42 | Darlyn - Darlyn Kay Schwartz Living Trus Loy | Wamego, KS 66547 | $44,465 |
43 | Conner Family Trust | Shawnee, KS 66227 | $42,843 |
44 | Smokey Hill River Cattle Co. LLC | Dighton, KS 67839 | $42,275 |
45 | Hell Creek Ranch Inc | Dighton, KS 67839 | $41,510 |
46 | Jasper Farms Inc | Dighton, KS 67839 | $40,691 |
47 | William A Huseman Trust No 1 | Dighton, KS 67839 | $40,000 |
48 | , | $38,452 | |
49 | Tory M Borell | Dighton, KS 67839 | $37,998 |
50 | , | $37,863 | |
51 | Bryan D Burnett | Scott City, KS 67871 | $36,624 |
52 | Rex Whipple Rev Trust | Beeler, KS 67518 | $35,735 |
53 | Hineman Land & Cattle Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $35,492 |
54 | Anchor Cattle Co | Dighton, KS 67839 | $35,280 |
55 | Bolding Farms Inc | Garden City, KS 67846 | $34,212 |
56 | Wesley L Miller | Quinter, KS 67752 | $33,868 |
57 | Gary - Shapland Family Revocable Lvg Tr Shapland | Dighton, KS 67839 | $33,355 |
58 | Edwin A Habiger Living Trust | Dighton, KS 67839 | $33,310 |
59 | Matthew W Miller | Utica, KS 67584 | $33,001 |
60 | Kristi M Miller | Utica, KS 67584 | $32,763 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”