Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Lane County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 117
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Lane County, Kansas totaled $504,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Coberly Land And Cattle Co Inc | Gove, KS 67736 | $3,900 |
42 | James M Coberly Living Trust | Gove, KS 67736 | $3,900 |
43 | Ty Panzner | Jetmore, KS 67854 | $3,780 |
44 | Floyd O Davis | Dighton, KS 67839 | $3,733 |
45 | , | $3,711 | |
46 | Jennison Ranch | Healy, KS 67850 | $3,643 |
47 | Brant Neil Mellies | Ness City, KS 67560 | $3,560 |
48 | Reuben Zimmerman | Dighton, KS 67839 | $3,375 |
49 | Teresa Anthony | Satanta, KS 67870 | $3,249 |
50 | Leon James Tuttle | Gove, KS 67736 | $3,146 |
51 | David N Mellies | Ness City, KS 67560 | $2,966 |
52 | Vance Shay | Healy, KS 67850 | $2,742 |
53 | Brendon Beesley | Gove, KS 67736 | $2,740 |
54 | Foos Farms Inc | Dighton, KS 67839 | $2,636 |
55 | Erik Felker | Dighton, KS 67839 | $2,616 |
56 | Mark Cramer | Healy, KS 67850 | $2,608 |
57 | Dirk Torson | Dighton, KS 67839 | $2,506 |
58 | Timothy Miller- Ta Miller Revocable Trust | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $2,333 |
59 | Ernest Mudd | Dighton, KS 67839 | $2,324 |
60 | Wtm Miller Ranch LLC | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $2,231 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”