Conservation Reserve Program in Lane County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 278
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Lane County, Kansas totaled $2,182,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Verna L Mc Bee | Cheney, KS 67025 | $12,140 |
62 | Shirley Eaton | Dighton, KS 67839 | $12,045 |
63 | Cynthia - Cynthia D Bradstreet Rev Trust D Bradstr | Dighton, KS 67839 | $11,983 |
64 | Bryce Schwartz & Sons LLC | Dighton, KS 67839 | $11,824 |
65 | Howard Fenley | Dighton, KS 67839 | $11,586 |
66 | Marilyn J Speer Ir Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $11,584 |
67 | Clifford Verhoeff | Hartman, CO 81043 | $11,362 |
68 | Shirley K Suppes | Dighton, KS 67839 | $11,214 |
69 | Ronald J Suppes | Dighton, KS 67839 | $11,214 |
70 | Dennis Thomas | Dighton, KS 67839 | $11,069 |
71 | Mcwhirter-campbell LLC | Dighton, KS 67839 | $11,060 |
72 | Danielle M Anderson Trust | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $11,018 |
73 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $10,925 |
74 | Philip E & Verna Ochs Trust | Overland Park, KS 66221 | $10,779 |
75 | Andrea Trembley Strong | Scott City, KS 67871 | $10,580 |
76 | Jesse R Beesley | Dighton, KS 67839 | $10,580 |
77 | Hanna Farms LLC | Tonganoxie, KS 66086 | $10,421 |
78 | Magie Farms | Salina, KS 67401 | $10,135 |
79 | Willie Riebel | Dighton, KS 67839 | $10,093 |
80 | Jlh Trust | Dighton, KS 67839 | $10,078 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”