Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Lane County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 172
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Lane County, Kansas totaled $3,797,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | D & A Farms | Dighton, KS 67839 | $9,453 |
82 | Guy Wayne Johnston | Dighton, KS 67839 | $9,350 |
83 | Wick Grain Company | Dighton, KS 67839 | $9,300 |
84 | Dylan Joseph Linenberger | Dighton, KS 67839 | $9,253 |
85 | Neil D Mcwhirter Revocable Trust | Dighton, KS 67839 | $9,246 |
86 | Lane County Farms LLC | Dighton, KS 67839 | $9,121 |
87 | Glenn Eitel | Dighton, KS 67839 | $9,047 |
88 | Keith Shapland | Dighton, KS 67839 | $8,003 |
89 | Horn Family Farms Inc | Dighton, KS 67839 | $7,935 |
90 | Larry Curtis Vogel | Dighton, KS 67839 | $7,634 |
91 | Neal Stanley | Dighton, KS 67839 | $7,597 |
92 | Sharp Farms | Healy, KS 67850 | $7,296 |
93 | Glenn W Coberly Trust | Gove, KS 67736 | $7,273 |
94 | Todd Siek | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $7,200 |
95 | Cramer Farms & Livestock Inc | Healy, KS 67850 | $6,922 |
96 | Anchor Cattle Co | Dighton, KS 67839 | $6,784 |
97 | Mary E Eitel | Dighton, KS 67839 | $6,445 |
98 | Maurice P Linden Trust | Dighton, KS 67839 | $6,430 |
99 | Matthew Mulville | Dighton, KS 67839 | $6,206 |
100 | E R Redburn Jr | Dighton, KS 67839 | $5,969 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”