Conservation Reserve Program in Lane County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 254
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Lane County, Kansas totaled $2,134,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | William Dean Delaney | Dighton, KS 67839 | $8,768 |
82 | Heath Farms | Dighton, KS 67839 | $8,722 |
83 | Marvin Whipple | Pawnee Rock, KS 67567 | $8,401 |
84 | Ken R Stormont | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $8,304 |
85 | Mark W Anderson | Belton, MO 64012 | $8,203 |
86 | Joel S Herndon | Dighton, KS 67839 | $8,160 |
87 | Galen Waterson | Peoria, AZ 85381 | $8,060 |
88 | Nancy C Gerstner | Mckinney, TX 75071 | $7,603 |
89 | Larry Wheatcroft | Wichita Falls, TX 76302 | $7,345 |
90 | Donald B Hutchins | Charlotte, NC 28210 | $7,203 |
91 | Herndon Survivor's Trust Uti 2/22/2000 | Dighton, KS 67839 | $7,036 |
92 | Herndon Family Trust U-t-i 2-22-00 | Dighton, KS 67839 | $7,036 |
93 | Don J Hineman | Dighton, KS 67839 | $6,925 |
94 | Trudy - Joseph & Trudy Heath Family Rev Heath | Dighton, KS 67839 | $6,839 |
95 | Von Johnston | Dighton, KS 67839 | $6,780 |
96 | Mi Casa Family Trust | Wichita, KS 67206 | $6,671 |
97 | James D Smith | Dighton, KS 67839 | $6,659 |
98 | Smokey Hill River Cattle Co. LLC | Dighton, KS 67839 | $6,448 |
99 | Jerald A Riemann Trust No 1 | Dighton, KS 67839 | $6,301 |
100 | Edwin I Mcleish | Stafford, KS 67578 | $6,190 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”