Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Lane County, Kansas, 2021

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 364

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Lane County, Kansas totaled $3,717,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
2021
121Bentley Family Irrevocable Land TrustDighton, KS 67839$7,243
122Keith L Cramer And Sandra K Cramer Rev Living TrusManhattan, KS 66503$7,107
123Alvin C Johnston EstateDighton, KS 67839$6,685
124Stacy TerwilligerDighton, KS 67839$6,657
125Kami TerwilligerDighton, KS 67839$6,656
126Anchor Cattle CoDighton, KS 67839$6,616
127Gary Esco Mc BeeDighton, KS 67839$6,515
128Rissler Ellenberger & Peel PtshpHoneoye Falls, NY 14472$6,465
129Merriel RileyHill City, KS 67642$6,402
130Brendon BeesleyGove, KS 67736$6,366
131Phyllis - Lester And Phyllis Burnett Liv M BurnettAnaheim, CA 92807$6,358
132Max Moomaw IncDighton, KS 67839$6,270
133Gary Ziegenbalg TrustHeber Springs, AR 72543$6,241
134Siek Family PartnershipCimarron, KS 67835$6,036
135Mary E EitelDighton, KS 67839$5,972
136Stacy - H Lawrence And Angela L Rev Tr LawrenceDighton, KS 67839$5,937
137Chad SpeerDighton, KS 67839$5,829
138Mary Lou BorellDighton, KS 67839$5,770
139Eldon N WancuraDighton, KS 67839$5,725
140Zachary J. DowellDighton, KS 67839$5,604

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag