Total Commodity Programs in Lane County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 610
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Lane County, Kansas totaled $6,172,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Brendon Beesley | Gove, KS 67736 | $10,228 |
142 | Siek Family Partnership | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $10,203 |
143 | Dry Lake Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $10,189 |
144 | Keith L Cramer And Sandra K Cramer Rev Living Trus | Manhattan, KS 66503 | $10,051 |
145 | Paula Gough | Dighton, KS 67839 | $9,691 |
146 | Anchor Cattle Co | Dighton, KS 67839 | $9,611 |
147 | Phyllis - Lester And Phyllis Burnett Liv M Burnett | Anaheim, CA 92807 | $9,610 |
148 | Ranger Feeders II LLC | Dighton, KS 67839 | $9,441 |
149 | James A Hoss | Ness City, KS 67560 | $9,193 |
150 | Susan D Hoss | Ness City, KS 67560 | $9,193 |
151 | M Gregory Dirks | Scott City, KS 67871 | $9,189 |
152 | Zachary J. Dowell | Dighton, KS 67839 | $8,923 |
153 | Mary Lou Borell | Dighton, KS 67839 | $8,824 |
154 | Glenn Eitel | Dighton, KS 67839 | $8,532 |
155 | Bryan Evans | Gove, KS 67736 | $8,355 |
156 | Gary Ziegenbalg Trust | Heber Springs, AR 72543 | $8,319 |
157 | Marit Charlotte Lanier Ehmke | Healy, KS 67850 | $8,158 |
158 | Lance Fulton Trust 1 | Garden City, KS 67846 | $8,100 |
159 | Eloise Doran | Saint John, KS 67576 | $7,919 |
160 | Christian Church In Kansas Inc | Topeka, KS 66611 | $7,740 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”