Conservation Reserve Program in Lane County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 740
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Lane County, Kansas totaled $52,546,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Irrevocable Trust Of Nelson Bryce | Dighton, KS 67839 | $400,803 |
22 | Paris Enterprises | Dighton, KS 67839 | $398,783 |
23 | Robert A Paris Trust | Dighton, KS 67839 | $397,888 |
24 | Shirley Eaton | Dighton, KS 67839 | $393,780 |
25 | Glenn Eitel | Dighton, KS 67839 | $391,938 |
26 | Margaret A Robbins Trust | Hyrum, UT 84319 | $391,546 |
27 | 34 Star Farms | Healy, KS 67850 | $391,281 |
28 | Irrevocable Trust Of Devin Lee Sc | Dighton, KS 67839 | $383,174 |
29 | John Heath Trust | Dighton, KS 67839 | $369,866 |
30 | Katrina Raylene West And John Mark West Family Tru | Dighton, KS 67839 | $365,880 |
31 | W O & P A Herndon Rev Trust | Dighton, KS 67839 | $364,678 |
32 | Philip Habiger | Dighton, KS 67839 | $360,390 |
33 | Walter O Herndon Family Trust | Dighton, KS 67839 | $350,000 |
34 | Gary Evel | Utica, KS 67584 | $345,994 |
35 | Willie Riebel | Dighton, KS 67839 | $345,410 |
36 | Sheryl C Knopp Trust | Branson, MO 65616 | $336,042 |
37 | Lillie Heath | Quinter, KS 67752 | $328,357 |
38 | William Dean Delaney | Dighton, KS 67839 | $326,085 |
39 | Heath Farms | Dighton, KS 67839 | $325,758 |
40 | Dennis Thomas | Dighton, KS 67839 | $324,862 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”