Total Commodity Programs in Lane County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,169
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Lane County, Kansas totaled $144,056,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Mark Cramer | Healy, KS 67850 | $542,268 |
62 | Gail Stanley | Dighton, KS 67839 | $529,739 |
63 | R & D Farms | Healy, KS 67850 | $528,604 |
64 | Vista Farms | Dighton, KS 67839 | $511,149 |
65 | Foos Farms Inc | Dighton, KS 67839 | $508,601 |
66 | Getz Land And Cattle | Gove, KS 67736 | $504,813 |
67 | Living Trust Of Saundra Sue Shapl | Dighton, KS 67839 | $499,092 |
68 | William Maughlin | Dighton, KS 67839 | $481,811 |
69 | C J Beef & Grain Inc | Dighton, KS 67839 | $481,785 |
70 | Dennis & Debra Dowell Rev Tr | Dighton, KS 67839 | $481,647 |
71 | Terry Penka | Dighton, KS 67839 | $480,383 |
72 | Marvin S Roberts Trust | Dighton, KS 67839 | $479,033 |
73 | Jay E. Schmalzried | Dighton, KS 67839 | $478,877 |
74 | Edwin Habiger Living Trust | Hays, KS 67601 | $478,532 |
75 | Ira Wallace | Colorado Springs, CO 80921 | $475,906 |
76 | Mark Edward Eitel | Dighton, KS 67839 | $473,222 |
77 | Thomas J Bennett | Healy, KS 67850 | $470,303 |
78 | Mark Shapland | Dighton, KS 67839 | $463,546 |
79 | Marvin & Wanda Pinkston Rev Trust | Wichita, KS 67206 | $459,936 |
80 | Steve Heath | Dighton, KS 67839 | $454,711 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”