Total Commodity Programs in Leavenworth County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,569
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Leavenworth County, Kansas totaled $38,886,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Steven D Navinsky | Winchester, KS 66097 | $127,540 |
82 | Lawrence E Theis | Leavenworth, KS 66048 | $126,887 |
83 | Dailey Angus Farms Llp | Mc Louth, KS 66054 | $121,506 |
84 | W Lee Wake | Leavenworth, KS 66048 | $120,419 |
85 | Oelschlaeger Farms | Linwood, KS 66052 | $118,581 |
86 | Michael F Gates Jr | Easton, KS 66020 | $117,769 |
87 | Gary L Jons | Basehor, KS 66007 | $116,562 |
88 | Eugene Pauly Farms Inc | Easton, KS 66020 | $112,707 |
89 | Walnut Hill Farms Inc | Easton, KS 66020 | $112,525 |
90 | C Eugene Heim | Leavenworth, KS 66048 | $112,132 |
91 | Ernzen Revocable Trust Dtd Octobe | Leavenworth, KS 66048 | $111,618 |
92 | Roger L Brandt Sr And Linda J Brandt Revocable Liv | Basehor, KS 66007 | $109,840 |
93 | Larry W Lee | Leavenworth, KS 66048 | $109,035 |
94 | Schlagel Farms LLC | Bonner Springs, KS 66012 | $107,069 |
95 | Holton Bros Dairy | Tonganoxie, KS 66086 | $106,267 |
96 | Brian E Potter | Easton, KS 66020 | $105,425 |
97 | Raymond H Martin | Tonganoxie, KS 66086 | $103,528 |
98 | Scott M Johnson | Lansing, KS 66043 | $102,213 |
99 | S & P Farms LLC | Richmond, MO 64085 | $101,636 |
100 | Richard A Sachse | Easton, KS 66020 | $101,313 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”