Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Lincoln County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 301
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Lincoln County, Kansas totaled $1,044,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mark Anton Brummer | Lincoln, KS 67455 | $6,455 |
22 | James M Mcclure | Tescott, KS 67484 | $6,444 |
23 | Ron Frederking Enterprises Inc | Sylvan Grove, KS 67481 | $6,175 |
24 | Richard A Brock | Hunter, KS 67452 | $5,747 |
25 | Michael W Gotti - Michael W Gotti Trust | Tescott, KS 67484 | $5,552 |
26 | De Ann A Ancell Trust | Dorrance, KS 67634 | $5,544 |
27 | Schroeder Brothers | Beverly, KS 67423 | $5,439 |
28 | Richard Ancell Farms LLC | Sylvan Grove, KS 67481 | $5,430 |
29 | Michael Cole | Beverly, KS 67423 | $5,363 |
30 | Thomas A Carney | Sylvan Grove, KS 67481 | $5,341 |
31 | Jeffrey Richard White | Lincoln, KS 67455 | $4,991 |
32 | Winckler Farms Inc | Lincoln, KS 67455 | $4,891 |
33 | Russell Frederking Farms Inc | Sylvan Grove, KS 67481 | $4,711 |
34 | Russ Ruby | Lincoln, KS 67455 | $4,623 |
35 | Heller Farms, LLC | Hunter, KS 67452 | $4,565 |
36 | Kenny J Brummer | Hunter, KS 67452 | $4,493 |
37 | Sheldon Land & Cattle LLC | Lincoln, KS 67455 | $4,445 |
38 | Jason W Wiebke | Lincoln, KS 67455 | $4,413 |
39 | Clint Cramton | Tescott, KS 67484 | $4,332 |
40 | Joe H Coover | Barnard, KS 67418 | $4,326 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”