Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Linn County, Kansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 309
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Linn County, Kansas totaled $595,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Keith Brownback | Centerville, KS 66014 | $3,210 |
42 | David Berglund | Lacygne, KS 66040 | $3,200 |
43 | Diana Self | Parker, KS 66072 | $3,131 |
44 | Kenneth Spillman | Mound City, KS 66056 | $3,112 |
45 | Linda K Conley - Conley Revocable Tr Dated 072109 | Pleasanton, KS 66075 | $3,106 |
46 | Austin Allen | Mound City, KS 66056 | $2,969 |
47 | Terry Broyles | Blue Mound, KS 66010 | $2,928 |
48 | Jeffrey Nichols | Pleasanton, KS 66075 | $2,856 |
49 | Dale Sprague | Blue Mound, KS 66010 | $2,727 |
50 | Herbert Brownback | Lacygne, KS 66040 | $2,678 |
51 | F David Thornberry | New Waverly, TX 77358 | $2,552 |
52 | Banning Angus Inc | Oak Creek, CO 80467 | $2,534 |
53 | Larry Breuel | Centerville, KS 66014 | $2,486 |
54 | Smilin D Farms Inc | Lacygne, KS 66040 | $2,400 |
55 | Joe Pointer | Pleasanton, KS 66075 | $2,349 |
56 | Kevin F Carothers | Lacygne, KS 66040 | $2,278 |
57 | Donnie Rhynerson | Blue Mound, KS 66010 | $2,257 |
58 | Charles B Singer | Parker, KS 66072 | $2,217 |
59 | Kurt Schwarz | Lacygne, KS 66040 | $2,216 |
60 | Greg Gentry | Pleasanton, KS 66075 | $2,207 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”