Farm Subsidy information
Linn County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Linn County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 2,934
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Linn County, Kansas totaled $151,426,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Shane Kern | Pleasanton, KS 66075 | $126,700 |
182 | Patricia A Nickell | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $126,107 |
183 | Bonne Terre Inc | Overland Park, KS 66224 | $126,018 |
184 | Edward L Samyn | Mound City, KS 66056 | $125,936 |
185 | Darin-darin L Dunlop L Dunlop | Parker, KS 66072 | $125,026 |
186 | James E Lowe | Louisburg, KS 66053 | $124,992 |
187 | Dale S Miller | Stanley, KS 66224 | $124,908 |
188 | Thomas E Tuggle | Mound City, KS 66056 | $124,119 |
189 | Keith Brownback | Centerville, KS 66014 | $123,295 |
190 | James Gabbert | Prescott, KS 66767 | $122,835 |
191 | Charles A Lindell | Pleasanton, KS 66075 | $122,132 |
192 | Lloyd L Wilson III | Centerville, KS 66014 | $120,805 |
193 | Dale Dennis | Topeka, KS 66614 | $120,794 |
194 | Phillip R Wimmer | Fulton, KS 66738 | $120,673 |
195 | Charles Peterson | Greeley, KS 66033 | $120,544 |
196 | Wayne White | Oklahoma City, OK 73179 | $120,377 |
197 | Kenneth Snyder | Fulton, KS 66738 | $118,807 |
198 | Rocking Arrow Cattle Co | Blue Mound, KS 66010 | $118,806 |
199 | Carter Trust Dated November 12, 2009 | Marshall, MO 65340 | $117,794 |
200 | John E Klopfenstein | Springfield, MO 65804 | $117,624 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”