Farm Subsidy information
Linn County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Linn County, Kansas, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 869
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Linn County, Kansas totaled $12,799,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | D. Wade Farms, LLC | Mapleton, KS 66754 | $113,326 |
22 | Roger Lynn Carbon | Mound City, KS 66056 | $102,518 |
23 | Loma Land & Cattle Ltd | Lacygne, KS 66040 | $101,578 |
24 | Thornberry Family Partnership Ltd | New Waverly, TX 77358 | $99,407 |
25 | Larry Stainbrook | Fontana, KS 66026 | $97,149 |
26 | Dwayne A Broyles | Blue Mound, KS 66010 | $88,986 |
27 | Charles L Haverfield | Parker, KS 66072 | $88,952 |
28 | Shane Kern | Pleasanton, KS 66075 | $87,516 |
29 | Sjdn Family Lacygne Farm LLC | Leawood, KS 66224 | $85,913 |
30 | Kenneth Spillman | Mound City, KS 66056 | $83,308 |
31 | Clark Brothers | Lacygne, KS 66040 | $79,397 |
32 | John S Johnson | Prescott, KS 66767 | $78,044 |
33 | Anita M Medlin | Mound City, KS 66056 | $76,509 |
34 | Gary Umphenour | Pleasanton, KS 66075 | $72,064 |
35 | Stainbrook Family Farm LLC | Lacygne, KS 66040 | $70,121 |
36 | Kevin Whitcomb | Centerville, KS 66014 | $69,085 |
37 | Lyle Shattuck | Prescott, KS 66767 | $68,464 |
38 | Harriet E Bogan | Prescott, KS 66767 | $66,145 |
39 | Ernest L Troth | Mound City, KS 66056 | $60,411 |
40 | Akes Cattle | Parker, KS 66072 | $57,623 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”