Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Logan County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 50
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Logan County, Kansas totaled $586,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Paul Beckman | Oakley, KS 67748 | $7,761 |
22 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $7,668 |
23 | Donald L Burks | Grinnell, KS 67738 | $7,162 |
24 | Scott Sheets | Brewster, KS 67732 | $7,084 |
25 | Raymond E Holaday | Oakley, KS 67748 | $6,837 |
26 | Kevin B Plummer - Plummer Family Trust | Oakley, KS 67748 | $6,152 |
27 | Ralph G Zerr | Park, KS 67751 | $5,834 |
28 | David J Glassman | Oakley, KS 67748 | $4,554 |
29 | Kvasnicka Family Living Trust - Richard Kvasnicka | Winona, KS 67764 | $4,485 |
30 | James Ward Taylor | Winona, KS 67764 | $4,387 |
31 | David Mendenhall | Gove, KS 67736 | $4,361 |
32 | Darren Flax | Quinter, KS 67752 | $3,682 |
33 | Darrin R Summers | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $3,582 |
34 | Darline Stramel - Darline K Stramel Trust | Winona, KS 67764 | $3,440 |
35 | Jason T Siruta | Colby, KS 67701 | $3,195 |
36 | Ethan James Glassman | Oakley, KS 67748 | $2,784 |
37 | Braydon D Summers | Wallace, KS 67761 | $2,706 |
38 | Dewey E Wright | Scott City, KS 67871 | $2,702 |
39 | James E Glassman | Oakley, KS 67748 | $2,603 |
40 | Dave Charles | Oakley, KS 67748 | $2,518 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”