Farm Subsidy information
Logan County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Logan County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 364
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Logan County, Kansas totaled $19,963,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Danielle Forsberg | Oakley, KS 67748 | $98,522 |
22 | Max Edwards | Scott City, KS 67871 | $97,232 |
23 | Jake Karlin | Hays, KS 67601 | $94,514 |
24 | Julie S Maurath | Oakley, KS 67748 | $92,429 |
25 | Eco Farms Inc | Monument, KS 67747 | $89,602 |
26 | Hanson Ranch Inc | Wallace, KS 67761 | $89,318 |
27 | William F Kuhlman | Oakley, KS 67748 | $79,412 |
28 | Wendy M Christopher Estate | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $79,246 |
29 | Southfork Enterprises Ltd | Russell Springs, KS 67764 | $78,753 |
30 | Lpr Inc | Russell Springs, KS 67764 | $75,471 |
31 | Dale Herschberger | Colby, KS 67701 | $74,659 |
32 | Bd Latham Farms | Winona, KS 67764 | $71,432 |
33 | Midway Feeders LLC | Oakley, KS 67748 | $66,832 |
34 | Dennis D Engel | Oakley, KS 67748 | $65,934 |
35 | James Ward Taylor | Winona, KS 67764 | $61,027 |
36 | Wright Ag Inc | Wallace, KS 67761 | $58,883 |
37 | Scott A Maurath | Oakley, KS 67748 | $58,125 |
38 | Gayla D Berkgren | Oakley, KS 67748 | $56,922 |
39 | Gary E Stoecker | Oakley, KS 67748 | $55,550 |
40 | John James LLC | Nebraska City, NE 68410 | $55,104 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”