Conservation Reserve Program in Logan County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 183
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Logan County, Kansas totaled $1,060,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Tracie Ottley | Oakley, KS 67748 | $4,581 |
62 | Wright Family Revocable Trust | Lexington, MI 48450 | $4,565 |
63 | Dale Herschberger | Colby, KS 67701 | $4,531 |
64 | Joyce Kriegh Trust | Goodland, KS 67735 | $4,439 |
65 | Scheetz Revocable Trust - Phyllis A Scheetz | Monument, KS 67747 | $4,428 |
66 | Andrew Baker | Leoti, KS 67861 | $4,183 |
67 | Alvin E Wray Trust | Overland Park, KS 66221 | $4,022 |
68 | R J Management LLC | Oakley, KS 67748 | $3,914 |
69 | Sharon Mccallop | Overland Park, KS 66221 | $3,848 |
70 | S K Farms Inc | Oakley, KS 67748 | $3,810 |
71 | Steven G Van Eaton | Monument, KS 67747 | $3,760 |
72 | Hays Family Farms LLC | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $3,498 |
73 | Joe Newman | Hoxie, KS 67740 | $3,256 |
74 | Marthanell M Turley Revoc Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $3,202 |
75 | J Matthew Mildenberger | Oakley, KS 67748 | $3,195 |
76 | Frederick B Parkhurst | Kerrville, TX 78028 | $3,166 |
77 | Jason Lamb | Russell Springs, KS 67764 | $3,153 |
78 | Harvest A General Partnership | Farmington, NM 87401 | $3,074 |
79 | Lola M Bretz | Wallace, KS 67761 | $3,003 |
80 | Mary Ann Bohnenblust | Mcpherson, KS 67460 | $2,984 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”