Conservation Reserve Program in Logan County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 195
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Logan County, Kansas totaled $1,006,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Brett Luhring | Ashburn, VA 20148 | $2,914 |
82 | Bradshaw Properties LLC | Colorado Springs, CO 80908 | $2,900 |
83 | John J Weber | Oakley, KS 67748 | $2,844 |
84 | Chester L Hayes & Nina M Hayes Rev Living Trust | St Francis, KS 67756 | $2,750 |
85 | Jason P. Zerr | Grainfield, KS 67737 | $2,719 |
86 | Beagley Revoc Trust Norma Jean | Oakley, KS 67748 | $2,713 |
87 | Stephen E Craig | Renton, WA 98058 | $2,636 |
88 | Hays Family Farms LLC | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $2,587 |
89 | Delbert L Rose | Scott City, KS 67871 | $2,503 |
90 | Terry L - Mcdaniel Family Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $2,361 |
91 | S K Farms Inc | Oakley, KS 67748 | $2,275 |
92 | Loren A Percival | Grinnell, KS 67738 | $2,092 |
93 | Bowen Family Trust | Burlington, CO 80807 | $2,024 |
94 | Naomi Ward Revoc Trust | Colby, KS 67701 | $1,949 |
95 | Lynn Fulton | Russell, KS 67665 | $1,926 |
96 | Frank J Avila | Saint George, KS 66535 | $1,926 |
97 | Alicia Unruh | Colby, KS 67701 | $1,925 |
98 | Primrose Hockersmith | Victoria, KS 67671 | $1,925 |
99 | Arthur Katt | Grainfield, KS 67737 | $1,908 |
100 | Mary Jonette Mckee | Norman, OK 73072 | $1,891 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”