Farm Subsidy information
Marion County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Marion County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,363
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Marion County, Kansas totaled $19,697,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Daniel Jost | Hillsboro, KS 67063 | $27,843 |
122 | Edwin Klenda | Marion, KS 66861 | $27,684 |
123 | Galen Eitzen | Hillsboro, KS 67063 | $27,594 |
124 | Robert W Loewen | Hillsboro, KS 67063 | $27,529 |
125 | Charles W Loewen | Hillsboro, KS 67063 | $27,529 |
126 | Edward P Vinduska Revocable Liv Tr | Marion, KS 66861 | $27,458 |
127 | Jeremy Loewen | Hillsboro, KS 67063 | $27,402 |
128 | Bernard J Waner | Peabody, KS 66866 | $27,366 |
129 | Verney & Janice Voth Family Trust | Newton, KS 67114 | $27,167 |
130 | Derek E Belton | Tampa, KS 67483 | $27,056 |
131 | Tim Kaufman | Durham, KS 67438 | $26,975 |
132 | Brandon Jay Butts | North Newton, KS 67117 | $26,923 |
133 | Randal B Vogel Revocable Living Trust | Marion, KS 66861 | $26,706 |
134 | Nicholas R Kraus | Marion, KS 66861 | $26,547 |
135 | Vickie Kay Kraus Trust | Marion, KS 66861 | $26,488 |
136 | Galen Becker | Burns, KS 66840 | $26,259 |
137 | Randall S & Debra A Windsor Rev Trust | Peabody, KS 66866 | $25,979 |
138 | Keith D Jost | Hillsboro, KS 67063 | $25,917 |
139 | Gregory K Wiens | Hillsboro, KS 67063 | $25,900 |
140 | Alan R Vogel | Marion, KS 66861 | $25,618 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”