Counter Cyclical Program in Marion County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,507
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Marion County, Kansas totaled $2,330,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Floyd H Nickel Trust | Newton, KS 67114 | $12,386 |
22 | Ronald G Hiebert Trust | Hillsboro, KS 67063 | $12,298 |
23 | Mike Meisinger | Hillsboro, KS 67063 | $12,154 |
24 | Diepenbrock Farms Inc | Lincolnville, KS 66858 | $12,097 |
25 | James W Thiessen Trust 1 | Hillsboro, KS 67063 | $12,015 |
26 | James & Brenda Enns Revocable Trust | Hillsboro, KS 67063 | $11,990 |
27 | Martin F Kroupa | Lincolnville, KS 66858 | $11,859 |
28 | Terril L Eberhard Rev Trust | Peabody, KS 66866 | $11,222 |
29 | Clifford Entz | Peabody, KS 66866 | $11,121 |
30 | Edmund F Kroupa Revocable Trust | Marion, KS 66861 | $10,881 |
31 | Clark E Wiebe Revocable Living Trust | North Newton, KS 67117 | $10,795 |
32 | Daniel J Oborny | Durham, KS 67438 | $10,738 |
33 | Gladys Preheim Trust | Peabody, KS 66866 | $10,674 |
34 | Edwin Klenda | Marion, KS 66861 | $10,659 |
35 | James Preheim Trust | Peabody, KS 66866 | $10,466 |
36 | Bernard J Waner | Peabody, KS 66866 | $10,458 |
37 | Gregory K Washmon Trust | Hillsboro, KS 67063 | $10,415 |
38 | Marlene Eitzen Trust | Hillsboro, KS 67063 | $10,381 |
39 | Jon W Thole Trust | Marion, KS 66861 | $10,259 |
40 | Lance Thiessen | Peabody, KS 66866 | $10,255 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”