Total Conservation Programs in Marshall County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 291
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Marshall County, Kansas totaled $640,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Studer Trust No. 1 Residuary Trust | Beattie, KS 66406 | $5,071 |
42 | William E Smith | Summerfield, KS 66541 | $5,043 |
43 | Francis Hanke | Waterville, KS 66548 | $4,934 |
44 | Larson Harvesting Inc | Waterville, KS 66548 | $4,798 |
45 | Miller Family Trust | Juniata, NE 68955 | $4,775 |
46 | Delores E Harries Rev Trust | Sun City West, AZ 85375 | $4,486 |
47 | Donald A Nolte | Beattie, KS 66406 | $4,484 |
48 | David R Stump Rev Trust No 1 | Blue Rapids, KS 66411 | $4,275 |
49 | K'lynne Degenhardt | Marysville, KS 66508 | $4,128 |
50 | , | $4,044 | |
51 | Donald H Kotapish | Blue Rapids, KS 66411 | $3,971 |
52 | James D Kotapish - James D Kotapish Tr Dated March | Blue Rapids, KS 66411 | $3,971 |
53 | Warren H Drinkgern Rev Trust | Bremen, KS 66412 | $3,876 |
54 | Jerry H Stump | Belleville, KS 66935 | $3,840 |
55 | J Kim Bramhall - J Kim And Annette M Bramhall Trus | Vermillion, KS 66544 | $3,682 |
56 | Clayton R Miller | Juniata, NE 68955 | $3,644 |
57 | Larry Donahue Inc | Frankfort, KS 66427 | $3,388 |
58 | Dan Wullschleger | Frankfort, KS 66427 | $3,361 |
59 | Pishny Four | Bucyrus, KS 66013 | $3,312 |
60 | Bar X Ranch LLC | Axtell, KS 66403 | $3,262 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”