Total Commodity Programs in Marshall County, Kansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 257
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Marshall County, Kansas totaled $865,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | David R Stump Rev Trust No 1 | Blue Rapids, KS 66411 | $3,946 |
42 | Sue Ellen Rowland Rev Trust No 1 | Marysville, KS 66508 | $3,923 |
43 | Leo Bernard Huninghake | Frankfort, KS 66427 | $3,922 |
44 | Cynthia Ann Meyer | Dakota Dunes, SD 57049 | $3,877 |
45 | Michael G Wilson | Bremen, KS 66412 | $3,876 |
46 | Matt Claeys | Marysville, KS 66508 | $3,863 |
47 | Robert Ballman | Marysville, KS 66508 | $3,650 |
48 | Edgar A Pralle | Blue Rapids, KS 66411 | $3,647 |
49 | Richard Buessing - Richard & Katheleen Buessing Tr | Axtell, KS 66403 | $3,574 |
50 | Steven Vering | Marysville, KS 66508 | $3,441 |
51 | Charlton I Holthaus | Marysville, KS 66508 | $3,394 |
52 | Daniel T & Patricia L Rottinghaus Family Trust | Axtell, KS 66403 | $3,377 |
53 | Richard E Burger - Richard & Phyllis Burger Trust | Axtell, KS 66403 | $3,308 |
54 | Shaughnessy Dairy Inc | Axtell, KS 66403 | $3,124 |
55 | Levi Jacob Stiner | Vermillion, KS 66544 | $2,982 |
56 | Morgan David Wanklyn | Frankfort, KS 66427 | $2,968 |
57 | Wayne Hildebrandt Trust | Marysville, KS 66508 | $2,840 |
58 | Clarence Hildebrandt Tr No 2 | Marysville, KS 66508 | $2,840 |
59 | , | $2,821 | |
60 | Adam L Ronnebaum | Axtell, KS 66403 | $2,603 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”