Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Marshall County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 132
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Marshall County, Kansas totaled $905,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Steven R Moser | Marysville, KS 66508 | $4,734 |
62 | Janie Nordhus | Baileyville, KS 66404 | $4,733 |
63 | Dale E Seematter | Frankfort, KS 66427 | $4,542 |
64 | Alma Lohse | Bremen, KS 66412 | $4,415 |
65 | Gerald Lloyd Gerstner Rev Trust | Frankfort, KS 66427 | $4,276 |
66 | H A Berens Trust Est | Daytona Beach, FL 32118 | $4,220 |
67 | Harold F & Virginia L Wanklyn Re | Salina, KS 67401 | $4,206 |
68 | Francis - Francis A Vering | Marysville, KS 66508 | $4,066 |
69 | Kent A Polson | Vermillion, KS 66544 | $3,903 |
70 | John D Polson | Vermillion, KS 66544 | $3,902 |
71 | Lyle Wenzl | Vermillion, KS 66544 | $3,710 |
72 | Milton H Kramme Family Trust | Marysville, KS 66508 | $3,643 |
73 | Margaret Nemec | Marysville, KS 66508 | $3,641 |
74 | Joseph - Joseph F & Strathman Jr | Axtell, KS 66403 | $3,564 |
75 | William Everett Kennedy III Rev Trust | Manhattan, KS 66503 | $3,500 |
76 | Edna Dierking | Marysville, KS 66508 | $3,500 |
77 | Glenda K Decker | Hollenberg, KS 66946 | $3,500 |
78 | Gary Maddox | Blue Rapids, KS 66411 | $3,466 |
79 | Sheldon A Voet | Home, KS 66438 | $3,411 |
80 | Lynn Bargmann | Bremen, KS 66412 | $3,269 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”