Conservation Reserve Program in Miami County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 627
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Miami County, Kansas totaled $9,290,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Gerald E Williams | Shawnee Mission, KS 66208 | $17,565 |
162 | City Of Louisburg | Louisburg, KS 66053 | $17,494 |
163 | John E Brady Jr | Lenexa, KS 66220 | $17,340 |
164 | Gene Kohlenberg Trust | Penfield, NY 14526 | $17,026 |
165 | Joyce Marie Allen | Paola, KS 66071 | $16,830 |
166 | Hollis William Hunt | Osawatomie, KS 66064 | $16,200 |
167 | Orion N Lewis | Olathe, KS 66062 | $15,874 |
168 | Country Club Estates Lp | Paola, KS 66071 | $15,838 |
169 | Ralph Coler | Paola, KS 66071 | $15,684 |
170 | Patrick J Svoboda | Bucyrus, KS 66013 | $15,542 |
171 | Irene Prothe | Paola, KS 66071 | $15,311 |
172 | Robert J Allen | Overland Park, KS 66204 | $15,292 |
173 | D Shemene Peckman Living Trust | Paola, KS 66071 | $15,219 |
174 | John E Brady Jr Trust | Lenexa, KS 66220 | $14,998 |
175 | Juan Nosti Trust | Liberty, MO 64069 | $14,964 |
176 | Curtis W Kettler | Paola, KS 66071 | $14,843 |
177 | Jimmie A Duncan | Topeka, KS 66604 | $14,591 |
178 | Mark Kettler | Paola, KS 66071 | $14,531 |
179 | Louis E Klein | Paola, KS 66071 | $14,499 |
180 | Robert Scherman | Paola, KS 66071 | $14,292 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”