Total Conservation Programs in Mitchell County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 119
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Mitchell County, Kansas totaled $464,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mitchco Farms Inc | Beloit, KS 67420 | $33,596 |
2 | Wiles Trust | Hunter, KS 67452 | $32,661 |
3 | Mears Limited Partnership | Beloit, KS 67420 | $25,492 |
4 | Beverly Stowell | Beloit, KS 67420 | $22,113 |
5 | Michael W Heller | Hunter, KS 67452 | $20,649 |
6 | James E Rinaldo | Hunter, KS 67452 | $20,646 |
7 | Mike Budke | Tipton, KS 67485 | $18,424 |
8 | Larry Tonne | Beloit, KS 67420 | $18,078 |
9 | Martin J Mcpeak | Glen Elder, KS 67446 | $18,060 |
10 | R & B Farms LLC | Tipton, KS 67485 | $12,747 |
11 | Shirley Mcpeak | Glen Elder, KS 67446 | $12,317 |
12 | Rodney G Seehafer | Hunter, KS 67452 | $12,155 |
13 | Pauline Filbert | Wichita, KS 67205 | $10,099 |
14 | Phyllis J Schmitt | Tipton, KS 67485 | $8,773 |
15 | Phasianus Colchicus LLC | Beloit, KS 67420 | $8,562 |
16 | Alex Mears | Beloit, KS 67420 | $8,186 |
17 | John D Gronewoller | Onaga, KS 66521 | $7,808 |
18 | Tim Wiles | Hunter, KS 67452 | $7,654 |
19 | Prairie Glen Farm Inc | Glen Elder, KS 67446 | $7,244 |
20 | Dale E Pacey | Lincoln, KS 67455 | $6,828 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>