Farm Subsidy information
Mitchell County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Mitchell County, Kansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 706
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mitchell County, Kansas totaled $13,390,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Christopher J Bell | Simpson, KS 67478 | $16,119 |
82 | J J Farms | Beloit, KS 67420 | $16,034 |
83 | Daniel J File | Beloit, KS 67420 | $15,990 |
84 | Daniel J Kadel | Beloit, KS 67420 | $15,417 |
85 | Gage Logan Grauerholz | Beloit, KS 67420 | $15,381 |
86 | Greg Cook | Beloit, KS 67420 | $15,351 |
87 | Brian Dell Brummer | Tipton, KS 67485 | $15,078 |
88 | Loren Pahls | Tipton, KS 67485 | $14,953 |
89 | Mike Budke | Tipton, KS 67485 | $14,783 |
90 | Haseltine Farms LLC | Cawker City, KS 67430 | $14,628 |
91 | Aaron E Peters | Ada, KS 67467 | $14,609 |
92 | Jeremy Joseph Budke | Beloit, KS 67420 | $14,606 |
93 | Jesse Ost | Hunter, KS 67452 | $14,550 |
94 | Dale E Koch | Beloit, KS 67420 | $14,481 |
95 | Thomas Deneke | Beloit, KS 67420 | $14,344 |
96 | Shirley Mcpeak | Glen Elder, KS 67446 | $14,323 |
97 | Alex Mears | Beloit, KS 67420 | $14,126 |
98 | David A Dubbert | Beloit, KS 67420 | $14,076 |
99 | Michael D Stewart | Barnard, KS 67418 | $14,029 |
100 | Jeffrey L Baxa | Beloit, KS 67420 | $13,743 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”