Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Mitchell County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 275
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Mitchell County, Kansas totaled $918,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Richard And Pamela R Tipton Living Trust | Toronto, KS 66777 | $1,796 |
122 | Steve J Winkel | Glen Elder, KS 67446 | $1,788 |
123 | Douglas J Eilert | Beloit, KS 67420 | $1,785 |
124 | Donald Eilert | Beloit, KS 67420 | $1,764 |
125 | V Vail Mcclintock Sr | Sterling, KS 67579 | $1,715 |
126 | Brian D Stillwell | Beloit, KS 67420 | $1,705 |
127 | Noel V Kadel | Beloit, KS 67420 | $1,697 |
128 | Shirley Mcguire | Beloit, KS 67420 | $1,623 |
129 | Brent R Budke | Beloit, KS 67420 | $1,616 |
130 | Eugene M Ellenz | Tipton, KS 67485 | $1,593 |
131 | Harold Greiner | Beloit, KS 67420 | $1,540 |
132 | Cedar Grove Farm Inc | Beloit, KS 67420 | $1,535 |
133 | John C Wiese | Garden City, KS 67846 | $1,528 |
134 | Barry E Mcpeak | Glen Elder, KS 67446 | $1,526 |
135 | John Francis Koenigsman | Overland Park, KS 66223 | $1,501 |
136 | Eric Gengler | Beloit, KS 67420 | $1,494 |
137 | Allyn L File | Beloit, KS 67420 | $1,472 |
138 | Lloyd E Thompson | Glen Elder, KS 67446 | $1,464 |
139 | Shirley Remus-dalps Remus Trust | Glen Elder, KS 67446 | $1,436 |
140 | Bennett L Bell | Beloit, KS 67420 | $1,418 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”