Farm Subsidy information
Montgomery County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Montgomery County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 943
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Montgomery County, Kansas totaled $8,802,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Chuck Springer | Independence, KS 67301 | $58,618 |
22 | Michael Springer | Neodesha, KS 66757 | $58,545 |
23 | Ethan Mccabe | Elk City, KS 67344 | $57,117 |
24 | Robert J Casey Rev Trust | Independence, KS 67301 | $54,322 |
25 | Gordon Family Trust | Coffeyville, KS 67337 | $51,196 |
26 | Kurtis L Swearingen | Independence, KS 67301 | $44,806 |
27 | Oliver Farm & Ranch LLC | Elk City, KS 67344 | $44,734 |
28 | David B Mcmillin | Independence, KS 67301 | $42,489 |
29 | Muller Construction Inc | Coffeyville, KS 67337 | $42,162 |
30 | Beason Farm | Elk City, KS 67344 | $41,865 |
31 | James Michael Perkins | Independence, KS 67301 | $41,298 |
32 | Amanda G Perkins | Independence, KS 67301 | $40,329 |
33 | Chadwick J Shultz | Elk City, KS 67344 | $39,659 |
34 | Dwayne Detar | Coffeyville, KS 67337 | $39,129 |
35 | Robert D Jones | Elk City, KS 67344 | $37,994 |
36 | Linda S Jones | Elk City, KS 67344 | $37,990 |
37 | Pickett Ranch LLC | Longton, KS 67352 | $37,939 |
38 | Scott Russell Mcmillin | Independence, KS 67301 | $37,355 |
39 | Mark E Muller | Coffeyville, KS 67337 | $36,442 |
40 | Jim L Clubine | Independence, KS 67301 | $35,031 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”