Farm Subsidy information
Montgomery County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Montgomery County, Kansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 876
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Montgomery County, Kansas totaled $15,433,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mike Jones | Cushing, OK 74023 | $75,602 |
22 | Skc Valley Farms | Independence, KS 67301 | $74,169 |
23 | Mitchell Acres L L C | Liberty, KS 67351 | $73,257 |
24 | Kurtis L Swearingen | Independence, KS 67301 | $72,889 |
25 | Keith D Osborn | Caney, KS 67333 | $71,334 |
26 | Russell Walker | Altoona, KS 66710 | $71,116 |
27 | Amy L Reichenberger | Independence, KS 67301 | $70,341 |
28 | John L Cannon | Howard, KS 67349 | $69,882 |
29 | Gene & Carletta Denny Rev Living Trust | Caney, KS 67333 | $68,148 |
30 | John C Wiseman | Howard, KS 67349 | $67,993 |
31 | James C Wiseman II | Howard, KS 67349 | $67,993 |
32 | Scott Land And Cattle LLC | Elk City, KS 67344 | $66,503 |
33 | Double Tree Cattle Co LLC | Havana, KS 67347 | $65,310 |
34 | Jim L Clubine | Independence, KS 67301 | $64,303 |
35 | Robert Anthony Campbell | Coffeyville, KS 67337 | $63,074 |
36 | Dan Small Dba Fairview Farms | Neodesha, KS 66757 | $62,915 |
37 | Earnest Douglas Seifert | Quapaw, OK 74363 | $59,935 |
38 | Chuck Springer | Independence, KS 67301 | $57,590 |
39 | Michael Springer | Neodesha, KS 66757 | $57,586 |
40 | William M Reichenberger | Independence, KS 67301 | $57,511 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”