Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Montgomery County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 565
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Montgomery County, Kansas totaled $1,241,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jim L Clubine | Independence, KS 67301 | $5,991 |
42 | , | $5,592 | |
43 | Gordon Family Trust | Coffeyville, KS 67337 | $5,590 |
44 | Steven V Walker | Moline, KS 67353 | $5,516 |
45 | Carlos Walker | Coffeyville, KS 67337 | $5,486 |
46 | John L Cannon | Howard, KS 67349 | $5,436 |
47 | Cheri D Dodson - The Cheri Dodson Rev Trust | Liberty, KS 67351 | $5,368 |
48 | Doyle W Powell | Coffeyville, KS 67337 | $5,290 |
49 | Wendall Wood | Welch, OK 74369 | $5,076 |
50 | Levi Frank Clubine | Havana, KS 67347 | $4,965 |
51 | John C Wiseman | Howard, KS 67349 | $4,953 |
52 | James C Wiseman II | Howard, KS 67349 | $4,953 |
53 | Mark E Muller | Coffeyville, KS 67337 | $4,946 |
54 | Rockin Bar Nothin Ranch Inc | Independence, KS 67301 | $4,923 |
55 | Herman Witwer | Coffeyville, KS 67337 | $4,887 |
56 | Morgan Bailey Adams | Elk Falls, KS 67345 | $4,811 |
57 | Ethan Mccabe | Elk City, KS 67344 | $4,630 |
58 | Flinton Meredith Mccabe | Elk City, KS 67344 | $4,630 |
59 | Stanley David Scott | Caney, KS 67333 | $4,584 |
60 | Kenny Ray Rollins | Elk City, KS 67344 | $4,579 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”