Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Morris County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 44
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Morris County, Kansas totaled $57,618 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Richard D Granzow Dba/ Four Bar Ran | Herington, KS 67449 | $1,043 |
22 | Beaver River Farms Corp | Salina, KS 67402 | $1,021 |
23 | Ecklund Family Farms Inc | Herington, KS 67449 | $1,008 |
24 | Bill J Boyce | Council Grove, KS 66846 | $989 |
25 | Darrell E Gutsch | Westwood Hls, KS 66205 | $977 |
26 | William Tiede | White City, KS 66872 | $958 |
27 | Foye Moloney | White City, KS 66872 | $898 |
28 | Werner Burhoop | Herington, KS 67449 | $807 |
29 | Craig C Johnson Trust | Council Grove, KS 66846 | $770 |
30 | Kenneth E Anderson | Council Grove, KS 66846 | $753 |
31 | Kenneth Britt | White City, KS 66872 | $605 |
32 | Mark K Stilwell | White City, KS 66872 | $572 |
33 | Monty P Stilwell | White City, KS 66872 | $572 |
34 | Jon H Nelson | Fort Worth, TX 76108 | $564 |
35 | Milan Harkness | Council Grove, KS 66846 | $360 |
36 | J D Ranch LLC | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $338 |
37 | Frank T Shope | White City, KS 66872 | $322 |
38 | Wayne Kasten | White City, KS 66872 | $320 |
39 | John Collier | Alta Vista, KS 66834 | $315 |
40 | Richard T Buttrey | Council Grove, KS 66846 | $229 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”