Total Emergency Relief Program in Neosho County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 223
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Neosho County, Kansas totaled $2,983,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hughes Grain And Cattle Inc | Galesburg, KS 66740 | $30,947 |
22 | Andrew Lee Augustin | Walnut, KS 66780 | $29,813 |
23 | Jacob Glen Stich | Chanute, KS 66720 | $27,641 |
24 | Triplett Grain LLC | Thayer, KS 66776 | $26,986 |
25 | Verl E Pontious | Parsons, KS 67357 | $25,690 |
26 | Robert John | Thayer, KS 66776 | $22,496 |
27 | David Ray Mahurin Jr | Thayer, KS 66776 | $22,028 |
28 | Larry W Ingraham | Chanute, KS 66720 | $21,159 |
29 | Vitt Farms | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $20,632 |
30 | Fred Richard Leck | Thayer, KS 66776 | $20,385 |
31 | Dorothy M Larue | Chanute, KS 66720 | $20,003 |
32 | Leland L Yarnell | Erie, KS 66733 | $19,730 |
33 | Russell Scott Cleaver | Erie, KS 66733 | $19,406 |
34 | Karl W Thornton | Thayer, KS 66776 | $19,314 |
35 | Albert L Ammann | Parsons, KS 67357 | $19,103 |
36 | Joe Harris | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $18,109 |
37 | Micheal James Beggs | Elsmore, KS 66732 | $18,046 |
38 | Phillip W Stich Revocable Trust | Chanute, KS 66720 | $17,074 |
39 | Neel Family Trust | Tulsa, OK 74133 | $16,964 |
40 | Matt Roecker | Chanute, KS 66720 | $16,631 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”