Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Neosho County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 354
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Neosho County, Kansas totaled $2,855,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Frank Young | Erie, KS 66733 | $8,061 |
102 | L E Carlson Jr | Stark, KS 66775 | $7,992 |
103 | Matthew John Harmon | St Paul, KS 66771 | $7,973 |
104 | Fager Bros LLC | Overland Park, KS 66223 | $7,761 |
105 | A & D Cox Farms Inc | Chanute, KS 66720 | $7,759 |
106 | Steven Earl Powers | Chanute, KS 66720 | $7,628 |
107 | David A Powers | Thayer, KS 66776 | $7,590 |
108 | James L York | Thayer, KS 66776 | $7,553 |
109 | James H Woodworth | Stark, KS 66775 | $7,469 |
110 | Billie R Quinn | Chanute, KS 66720 | $7,450 |
111 | Joe W Stich | Chanute, KS 66720 | $7,358 |
112 | Brett Layne Thornton | Thayer, KS 66776 | $7,195 |
113 | Neely Livestock LLC | Chanute, KS 66720 | $7,193 |
114 | Randy Studebaker | Thayer, KS 66776 | $7,186 |
115 | Clay Paul Diediker | Parsons, KS 67357 | $7,176 |
116 | Duane Elrod | Erie, KS 66733 | $7,157 |
117 | Max D Roberts | Erie, KS 66733 | $7,034 |
118 | Kenneth L Mccoy | Chanute, KS 66720 | $7,032 |
119 | Stich Living Trust | Chanute, KS 66720 | $6,922 |
120 | Matt Roecker | Chanute, KS 66720 | $6,837 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”