Farm Subsidy information
Neosho County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Neosho County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,628
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Neosho County, Kansas totaled $163,860,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bill G Richwine | Erie, KS 66733 | $838,521 |
22 | Michael Watts | Chanute, KS 66720 | $816,665 |
23 | Harold Leon Heady | Parsons, KS 67357 | $772,534 |
24 | Kansas Farming Company | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $758,768 |
25 | Peck Brothers Cattle, LLC | Erie, KS 66733 | $729,262 |
26 | Kepley Enterprises LLC | Chanute, KS 66720 | $669,846 |
27 | Kepley Farms Inc | Chanute, KS 66720 | $667,178 |
28 | Lee Diediker Living Trust | Parsons, KS 67357 | $666,834 |
29 | Francis And Geneva Stich Living R | Chanute, KS 66720 | $655,410 |
30 | Joe Harris | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $627,351 |
31 | John L Good | Parsons, KS 67357 | $622,612 |
32 | Stephen J Grosdidier | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $622,167 |
33 | Olin Goins Marital Trust | Thayer, KS 66776 | $598,901 |
34 | Vitt Farms | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $589,135 |
35 | R D J Farm | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $583,928 |
36 | Brant Farms Inc | Thayer, KS 66776 | $581,064 |
37 | Clay Paul Diediker | Parsons, KS 67357 | $554,135 |
38 | Max Page | Erie, KS 66733 | $551,533 |
39 | Hugo Spieker | Chanute, KS 66720 | $550,789 |
40 | Mm Ranch Polled Herefords LLC | Chanute, KS 66720 | $534,321 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”