Farm Subsidy information
Neosho County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Neosho County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,498
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Neosho County, Kansas totaled $142,045,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Beachner Brothers Partnership | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $4,770,033 |
2 | Hughes Hog Farm | Galesburg, KS 66740 | $1,082,261 |
3 | Gary Gene Beggs | Savonburg, KS 66772 | $1,050,802 |
4 | Mark Blackburn | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $1,050,076 |
5 | Steven Earl Powers | Chanute, KS 66720 | $1,038,678 |
6 | Midwestern Farming Co | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $1,032,888 |
7 | Brungardt Dairy | Galesburg, KS 66740 | $1,023,488 |
8 | Robert John | Thayer, KS 66776 | $1,020,683 |
9 | C W Triplett | Thayer, KS 66776 | $947,671 |
10 | Jarold W Henry | Chanute, KS 66720 | $913,034 |
11 | A & D Cox Farms Inc | Chanute, KS 66720 | $911,436 |
12 | Hughes Grain And Cattle Inc | Galesburg, KS 66740 | $909,336 |
13 | Triplett Grain LLC | Thayer, KS 66776 | $892,261 |
14 | Jerry Brant | Thayer, KS 66776 | $890,450 |
15 | Matthew D Richard | Chanute, KS 66720 | $872,273 |
16 | Kepley Bros LLC | Chanute, KS 66720 | $850,033 |
17 | Phillip W Stich Revocable Trust | Chanute, KS 66720 | $844,745 |
18 | Legacy Farms LLC | Chanute, KS 66720 | $802,725 |
19 | Bill G Richwine | Erie, KS 66733 | $746,746 |
20 | Kansas Farming Company | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $737,326 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>