Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Neosho County, Kansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 442
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Neosho County, Kansas totaled $1,539,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gary Gene Beggs | Savonburg, KS 66772 | $76,153 |
2 | Kepley Enterprises LLC | Chanute, KS 66720 | $62,158 |
3 | Legacy Farms LLC | Chanute, KS 66720 | $60,922 |
4 | Robert John | Thayer, KS 66776 | $42,025 |
5 | Phillip W Stich Revocable Trust | Chanute, KS 66720 | $38,962 |
6 | Matthew D Richard | Chanute, KS 66720 | $37,207 |
7 | Bill G Richwine | Erie, KS 66733 | $36,242 |
8 | Vitt Farms | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $35,954 |
9 | Clay Paul Diediker | Parsons, KS 67357 | $35,558 |
10 | Beachner Brothers Partnership | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $34,782 |
11 | Steven Earl Powers | Chanute, KS 66720 | $32,633 |
12 | Brungardt Dairy | Galesburg, KS 66740 | $31,002 |
13 | Bryan Kramer | Galesburg, KS 66740 | $28,598 |
14 | R & A Kepley Farms Inc | Chanute, KS 66720 | $26,824 |
15 | Joey J O'brien | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $26,209 |
16 | Joe W Stich | Chanute, KS 66720 | $21,835 |
17 | Kansas Farming Company | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $21,442 |
18 | David Ray Mahurin Jr | Thayer, KS 66776 | $21,173 |
19 | Matthew D Stich | Chanute, KS 66720 | $20,868 |
20 | A & D Cox Farms Inc | Chanute, KS 66720 | $20,595 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>