Direct Payment Program in Neosho County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,336
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Neosho County, Kansas totaled $16,670,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Beachner Brothers Partnership | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $767,279 |
2 | Hughes Hog Farm | Galesburg, KS 66740 | $311,574 |
3 | Midwestern Farming Co | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $272,592 |
4 | Jerry Brant | Thayer, KS 66776 | $269,315 |
5 | Brungardt Dairy | Galesburg, KS 66740 | $233,942 |
6 | Francis And Geneva Stich Living R | Chanute, KS 66720 | $209,758 |
7 | Mark Blackburn | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $209,348 |
8 | Steven Earl Powers | Chanute, KS 66720 | $206,176 |
9 | Matthew D Richard | Chanute, KS 66720 | $196,283 |
10 | C W Triplett | Thayer, KS 66776 | $189,830 |
11 | Phillip W Stich Revocable Trust | Chanute, KS 66720 | $185,544 |
12 | Olin Goins Marital Trust | Thayer, KS 66776 | $177,998 |
13 | A & D Cox Farms Inc | Chanute, KS 66720 | $170,722 |
14 | Charles D Triplett | Thayer, KS 66776 | $167,446 |
15 | Robert John | Thayer, KS 66776 | $166,979 |
16 | Lee Diediker Living Trust | Parsons, KS 67357 | $164,913 |
17 | John Kramer | Galesburg, KS 66740 | $164,896 |
18 | Bill G Richwine | Erie, KS 66733 | $159,008 |
19 | William Albert Stich | Chanute, KS 66720 | $152,734 |
20 | Jarold W Henry | Chanute, KS 66720 | $150,927 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>