Market Loss Assistance Program in Ness County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,793
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Ness County, Kansas totaled $15,241,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Paul Schwien | Bazine, KS 67516 | $75,228 |
22 | Rex Whipple Rev Trust | Beeler, KS 67518 | $73,614 |
23 | Douglas R Petersilie | Ness City, KS 67560 | $72,989 |
24 | Larry D Weeks Living Trust | Brownell, KS 67521 | $72,906 |
25 | Delmar W Von Lehe | Ness City, KS 67560 | $71,658 |
26 | Kent D Davison | Ness City, KS 67560 | $71,218 |
27 | Harold Hoss-harold & Joyce Hoss Trust | Ness City, KS 67560 | $69,541 |
28 | Ronald D & Dorothy A Horchem Tr | Ransom, KS 67572 | $68,990 |
29 | Don Humburg | Ness City, KS 67560 | $68,206 |
30 | Neal Delaney | Ness City, KS 67560 | $68,088 |
31 | Rod Giess | Arnold, KS 67515 | $67,420 |
32 | Eldon Fehrenbach | Ness City, KS 67560 | $67,224 |
33 | Dwight E Filbert | Lincoln, NE 68516 | $65,694 |
34 | Jeb J Klitzke | Ransom, KS 67572 | $65,508 |
35 | Dennis Maier | Bazine, KS 67516 | $65,336 |
36 | Seib & Sons Farm Account | Ness City, KS 67560 | $65,102 |
37 | Donald-donald D Bake D Baker | Utica, KS 67584 | $63,894 |
38 | Lyle-lyle & Mary Dav V Davison | Ness City, KS 67560 | $62,978 |
39 | Stuart N Schweitzer | Ness City, KS 67560 | $62,972 |
40 | Sun Terra Inc | Ness City, KS 67560 | $62,822 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”