Total Conservation Programs in Ness County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 476
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Ness County, Kansas totaled $2,168,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Keith W Parkerson | Ness City, KS 67560 | $18,348 |
22 | Jo Parkerson | Ness City, KS 67560 | $18,348 |
23 | Gary L Glenn | Ness City, KS 67560 | $18,332 |
24 | Delaney Family Limited Liability Company | Burdett, KS 67523 | $17,878 |
25 | Thomas A Frusher | Ness City, KS 67560 | $17,564 |
26 | Kristopher M Kessler | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $16,938 |
27 | P & P Enterprises LLC | Ness City, KS 67560 | $16,278 |
28 | Juanita Parker-arlan & Juanita Parker Tr 2019 | Ness City, KS 67560 | $16,278 |
29 | Carlynn Foos | Ness City, KS 67560 | $15,989 |
30 | Spring Creek Cattle Inc | Beeler, KS 67518 | $15,840 |
31 | Carolyn Thompson | Mc Cracken, KS 67556 | $15,746 |
32 | Robert Stickney-robert Stickney & Becky Stickney T | Overland Park, KS 66210 | $15,294 |
33 | Robert Schniepp | Madison, WI 53704 | $14,999 |
34 | Janell M Michel | Brownell, KS 67521 | $14,963 |
35 | Randy Eddy | Cedar Vale, KS 67024 | $14,723 |
36 | Paul Schwien | Bazine, KS 67516 | $14,513 |
37 | Stanley R Erb | Bazine, KS 67516 | $14,305 |
38 | Horchem & Sons Inc | Ness City, KS 67560 | $14,062 |
39 | Rod Giess | Arnold, KS 67515 | $13,625 |
40 | Wilderness Land Company, LLC | Beaver, WV 25813 | $13,463 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”