Total Emergency Relief Program in Ness County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 444
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Ness County, Kansas totaled $3,997,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kyle Antenen-steven K & Gail A Antenen Trust | Ness City, KS 67560 | $23,234 |
42 | Garrett M. Flax | Utica, KS 67584 | $22,903 |
43 | Hal K Hoss | Ness City, KS 67560 | $22,735 |
44 | Stum Living Trust | Ness City, KS 67560 | $22,616 |
45 | Tanner Rider | Ness City, KS 67560 | $21,475 |
46 | V Keith Burditt Jr | Ness City, KS 67560 | $21,253 |
47 | Travis W Petersilie | Ness City, KS 67560 | $21,070 |
48 | Kevin J Flax | Ransom, KS 67572 | $20,895 |
49 | Jon A Johnson | Utica, KS 67584 | $20,460 |
50 | Jason B Pavlu | Ness City, KS 67560 | $19,440 |
51 | Gerome L Copeland | Ness City, KS 67560 | $19,346 |
52 | Toby R. Witthuhn | Ness City, KS 67560 | $19,159 |
53 | Donald D Baker-donald D Baker Trust | Utica, KS 67584 | $19,004 |
54 | Stephanie L Goldenberg | Spearville, KS 67876 | $18,413 |
55 | Don Humburg | Ness City, KS 67560 | $18,131 |
56 | Jed E & Arielle S Simpson Rev Trust No 1 | Hays, KS 67601 | $18,121 |
57 | Donald-rayetta Hoss Living Trust | Ness City, KS 67560 | $17,921 |
58 | Horchem & Sons Inc | Ness City, KS 67560 | $17,665 |
59 | Phillip Bryan Mcdaniel | Ransom, KS 67572 | $17,510 |
60 | Alex Nichepor Jr | Ness City, KS 67560 | $17,197 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”