Total Conservation Programs in Ness County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 399
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Ness County, Kansas totaled $1,917,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Joy Etta Jochum-schell | Ness City, KS 67560 | $12,621 |
42 | , | $12,314 | |
43 | Carl Keilman | Ness City, KS 67560 | $12,229 |
44 | Edwin I Mcleish | Stafford, KS 67578 | $11,991 |
45 | Berniece Blakely | Hays, KS 67601 | $11,980 |
46 | Horchem & Sons Inc | Ness City, KS 67560 | $11,863 |
47 | Donald E Flory & Vera M Flory Rev Living Jt Trust | Pomona, KS 66076 | $11,697 |
48 | Rex D Borthwick | Beeler, KS 67518 | $11,315 |
49 | Lone Prairie LLC | Morrison, CO 80465 | $10,992 |
50 | Robison Farm L.l.c | Olathe, KS 66061 | $10,842 |
51 | B & C Vogel Revocable Trust | Ness City, KS 67560 | $10,722 |
52 | Wade Vogel | Ness City, KS 67560 | $10,722 |
53 | Stoecklein Living Trust | Ness City, KS 67560 | $10,693 |
54 | Rod Giess | Arnold, KS 67515 | $10,470 |
55 | Roy Thornburg | Utica, KS 67584 | $10,252 |
56 | Allen Schuler-allen And Victoria Schuler Living Tr | Ness City, KS 67560 | $10,249 |
57 | Wendell C Hinman And Gladys A Hinman Rvoc Living T | Lewis, KS 67552 | $9,750 |
58 | Elsey Partners LLC | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $9,662 |
59 | , | $9,638 | |
60 | Gregory Wade Kerr | Hays, KS 67601 | $9,369 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”