Farm Subsidy information
Ness County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Ness County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,149
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ness County, Kansas totaled $13,695,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Bruntz Bros | Bazine, KS 67516 | $37,028 |
62 | Nathan Mcdonald | Ness City, KS 67560 | $36,934 |
63 | Tyler W Rider | Ness City, KS 67560 | $36,503 |
64 | Jrb Farms Inc | Ransom, KS 67572 | $35,987 |
65 | Paul Schwien | Bazine, KS 67516 | $35,941 |
66 | Kevin J Flax | Ransom, KS 67572 | $35,785 |
67 | Linn Kleweno | Bazine, KS 67516 | $34,699 |
68 | B & C Vogel Revocable Trust | Ness City, KS 67560 | $34,527 |
69 | Wade Vogel | Ness City, KS 67560 | $34,527 |
70 | Jared M Stieben | Brownell, KS 67521 | $34,312 |
71 | V Keith Burditt Jr | Ness City, KS 67560 | $34,202 |
72 | Terrence A Flax | Ransom, KS 67572 | $33,648 |
73 | Nuss Farms Inc | Jetmore, KS 67854 | $33,459 |
74 | Stephanie J Rider | Ness City, KS 67560 | $32,095 |
75 | Gary F Foos | Ness City, KS 67560 | $31,750 |
76 | Anson Seib | Ness City, KS 67560 | $31,736 |
77 | Cletus Flax | Brownell, KS 67521 | $31,454 |
78 | Eldon Fehrenbach | Ness City, KS 67560 | $31,085 |
79 | Chris I Hagelgantz | Mc Cracken, KS 67556 | $31,012 |
80 | Don Irvin Farms Inc | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $30,889 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”