Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Ness County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 217
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Ness County, Kansas totaled $1,044,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Ilene Norton Trust | Ness City, KS 67560 | $3,267 |
82 | George W Riffel | Ness City, KS 67560 | $3,182 |
83 | Harold Hoss-harold & Joyce Hoss Trust | Ness City, KS 67560 | $3,128 |
84 | John L Dietterich | Ransom, KS 67572 | $3,074 |
85 | Darren Mcvicker | Ness City, KS 67560 | $2,982 |
86 | Gary L Brenner | Beeler, KS 67518 | $2,955 |
87 | Foos Paul & Sons Partn | Ness City, KS 67560 | $2,940 |
88 | Ben D Rufenacht Jr | Ness City, KS 67560 | $2,817 |
89 | Clarence Foos | Bazine, KS 67516 | $2,801 |
90 | Seib & Sons Inc | Ness City, KS 67560 | $2,782 |
91 | Richard-klitzke Fami Klitzke | Ransom, KS 67572 | $2,740 |
92 | Barry G Schwien | Bazine, KS 67516 | $2,679 |
93 | Steven-gail Antenen Kyle Antenen | Ness City, KS 67560 | $2,660 |
94 | Oliver T Salmans | Hanston, KS 67849 | $2,635 |
95 | Dwayne Richardson | Brownell, KS 67521 | $2,619 |
96 | Charles W Walker | Brownell, KS 67521 | $2,606 |
97 | Bruntz Bros | Bazine, KS 67516 | $2,464 |
98 | James P Johnson | Utica, KS 67584 | $2,363 |
99 | Nick Stieben | Bazine, KS 67516 | $2,258 |
100 | Robert M Hagelgantz | Bazine, KS 67516 | $2,195 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”