Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Ness County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 886
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Ness County, Kansas totaled $19,274,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Leland Rein | Bazine, KS 67516 | $70,881 |
82 | Tanner S. Mcninch | Ness City, KS 67560 | $65,952 |
83 | Jared B Delaney | Ness City, KS 67560 | $65,818 |
84 | Tanner Rider | Ness City, KS 67560 | $65,808 |
85 | Donald D Baker-donald D Baker Trust | Utica, KS 67584 | $64,831 |
86 | Larry Kleweno | Bazine, KS 67516 | $64,708 |
87 | Bruce J Witthuhn | Ness City, KS 67560 | $64,658 |
88 | Warren J Sutton | Ness City, KS 67560 | $64,470 |
89 | Wilhelm Braun - B & R Family Trust | Brownell, KS 67521 | $64,209 |
90 | Sekavec Farms Inc | Brownell, KS 67521 | $64,184 |
91 | Darren R Dinges | Ness City, KS 67560 | $64,138 |
92 | James P Johnson | Utica, KS 67584 | $63,504 |
93 | Dennis C Atwell Living Trust | Hays, KS 67601 | $62,537 |
94 | Rod Solze | Utica, KS 67584 | $61,416 |
95 | B & C Vogel Revocable Trust | Ness City, KS 67560 | $61,225 |
96 | Wade Vogel | Ness City, KS 67560 | $61,224 |
97 | Gary Barnes | Mc Cracken, KS 67556 | $58,827 |
98 | Bobby D Blakely | Beeler, KS 67518 | $58,294 |
99 | Sweetwater Crop And Livestock LLC | Ransom, KS 67572 | $57,309 |
100 | Fred Flax | Ransom, KS 67572 | $57,197 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”