Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Ness County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 266
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Ness County, Kansas totaled $831,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Pete Flax | Ransom, KS 67572 | $2,552 |
102 | Travis W Bauer | Utica, KS 67584 | $2,547 |
103 | , | $2,522 | |
104 | Russell L Smith | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $2,511 |
105 | Brayden Vogel | Ness City, KS 67560 | $2,511 |
106 | Aaron S Pavlu | Ness City, KS 67560 | $2,505 |
107 | Richard-klitzke Family Rev Trust | Hays, KS 67601 | $2,500 |
108 | , | $2,465 | |
109 | Bradley Schaben | Bazine, KS 67516 | $2,452 |
110 | Jerald D Nuss - Nuss Living Trust | Jetmore, KS 67854 | $2,413 |
111 | Evel Ranch LLC | Utica, KS 67584 | $2,387 |
112 | Vernon L Flax | Utica, KS 67584 | $2,382 |
113 | John A Koriel | Rush Center, KS 67575 | $2,352 |
114 | Clayton J Pfannenstiel | Hays, KS 67601 | $2,352 |
115 | Bruntz Bros | Bazine, KS 67516 | $2,307 |
116 | Travis W Petersilie | Ness City, KS 67560 | $2,288 |
117 | Miller Farms | Quinter, KS 67752 | $2,253 |
118 | James Dennis Johnson-james And Joyce Johnson Livin | Beeler, KS 67518 | $2,233 |
119 | Spring Creek Cattle Inc | Beeler, KS 67518 | $2,171 |
120 | Harold Shank-harold And Janice Shank Rev Trust | Hanston, KS 67849 | $2,128 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”