Market Loss Assistance Program in Ness County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,793
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Ness County, Kansas totaled $15,241,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Kenneth R Schlegel | Ness City, KS 67560 | $37,042 |
102 | Melvin Hair | Brownell, KS 67521 | $36,856 |
103 | Rex Huxman | Arnold, KS 67515 | $36,637 |
104 | Gary Stieben | Bazine, KS 67516 | $36,448 |
105 | Darren Mcvicker | Ness City, KS 67560 | $36,241 |
106 | Dale Lindsley | Hutchinson, KS 67502 | $36,032 |
107 | Kristopher M Kessler | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $35,830 |
108 | Myron Filbert | Brownell, KS 67521 | $35,519 |
109 | Randy Betz | Ness City, KS 67560 | $35,501 |
110 | Kerry Dinges | Ness City, KS 67560 | $35,329 |
111 | Ronald Huxman | Arnold, KS 67515 | $35,328 |
112 | Kevin Frank | Ness City, KS 67560 | $35,107 |
113 | Jerry Rider | Ness City, KS 67560 | $34,805 |
114 | Carlynn Foos | Ness City, KS 67560 | $34,799 |
115 | Gerald Barnes | Mc Cracken, KS 67556 | $33,991 |
116 | Brian Mauch | Ness City, KS 67560 | $33,721 |
117 | Rick D Stenzel | Ness City, KS 67560 | $33,557 |
118 | Christina Hoelscher | San Jose, CA 95120 | $33,356 |
119 | Cletus Flax | Brownell, KS 67521 | $32,487 |
120 | Kirk Rufenacht | Ransom, KS 67572 | $32,187 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”