Total Disaster Programs in Ness County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 394
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Ness County, Kansas totaled $4,460,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Kyle Randa | Utica, KS 67584 | $11,052 |
122 | Riverside Planting LLC | Ness City, KS 67560 | $10,710 |
123 | Harold Shank-harold And Janice Shank Rev Trust | Hanston, KS 67849 | $10,703 |
124 | Shane Hinnergardt | Burdett, KS 67523 | $10,665 |
125 | Don Humburg | Ness City, KS 67560 | $10,556 |
126 | Brayden Vogel | Ness City, KS 67560 | $10,524 |
127 | John Mauch Jr | Beeler, KS 67518 | $10,433 |
128 | Thomas J Bernbeck | Utica, KS 67584 | $10,265 |
129 | Stephen B Nichepor | Ness City, KS 67560 | $10,182 |
130 | Dillon Mcvicker | Ness City, KS 67560 | $10,175 |
131 | Jerald D Nuss - Nuss Living Trust | Jetmore, KS 67854 | $10,114 |
132 | Darrin M Cox | Hanston, KS 67849 | $10,089 |
133 | Evel Ranch LLC | Utica, KS 67584 | $10,005 |
134 | Jerry L Gross Jr | Bazine, KS 67516 | $9,949 |
135 | Gaylen Kerr | Ness City, KS 67560 | $9,779 |
136 | Billie D Schreiber | Ransom, KS 67572 | $9,726 |
137 | Ina B Wilkerson | Dighton, KS 67839 | $9,692 |
138 | Ben D Rufenacht Jr | Ness City, KS 67560 | $9,689 |
139 | George Lane Copeland | Ness City, KS 67560 | $9,623 |
140 | Joe E Rupp | Ness City, KS 67560 | $9,574 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”