Farm Subsidy information
Norton County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Norton County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,786
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Norton County, Kansas totaled $331,670,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ivan Kingham | Norton, KS 67654 | $925,330 |
42 | Robert L Clydesdale Living Trust | Edmond, KS 67645 | $912,689 |
43 | Larry Griffin | Almena, KS 67622 | $910,688 |
44 | Justin T Hogan | Densmore, KS 67645 | $902,143 |
45 | R & S Van Loenen Farms LLC | Prairie View, KS 67664 | $894,423 |
46 | Maddy Ranch Inc | Norton, KS 67654 | $891,689 |
47 | Vince Edward Wagoner | Lenora, KS 67645 | $880,296 |
48 | Miller Farms And Feedlot Gp | Norcatur, KS 67653 | $878,199 |
49 | Steven Cox Associates LLC | Long Island, KS 67647 | $875,000 |
50 | Jerry Rhodes | Norcatur, KS 67653 | $863,946 |
51 | Ray Darnell Poage Living Tr | Almena, KS 67622 | $845,432 |
52 | Esslinger Ranch Gp | Norton, KS 67654 | $835,650 |
53 | Robert Sproul | Norton, KS 67654 | $831,553 |
54 | Elk Creek Farms LLC | Lenora, KS 67645 | $831,378 |
55 | Lynn D & Debra J Thiele Tr | Norton, KS 67654 | $828,468 |
56 | Marvin H O Stutheit | Norton, KS 67654 | $811,421 |
57 | Spencer Lee Braun | Norton, KS 67654 | $810,650 |
58 | Lloyd Sproul Rev Tr | Norton, KS 67654 | $810,090 |
59 | Lee A Brobst | Logan, KS 67646 | $800,241 |
60 | Stan E Miller | Norcatur, KS 67653 | $792,982 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”